Skip to content

Quantitative reference

The calculation chain from the mole outward — with canonical worked examples, HL-only calculations marked, and the maths you do not need.

Editorial framing Every calculation in IB Chemistry hangs off a single backbone: the mole. Master the chain below and every multi-step HL question becomes a sequence of sub-steps you already know. The chain is read top-to-bottom; each step links to the sub-topic primer that owns it, and each step exposes its parent so the dependency order is explicit, not just visual.

The central chain

  1. S1.4.1n ↔ N via N_ASLS1.4 primer →
  2. S1.4.2–3A_r, M_r, M; n = m/MSLS1.4 primer →

    Worked example: Mass → moles via n = m/M

    Given: 2.45 g of H₂SO₄. M(H₂SO₄) = 98.08 g mol⁻¹.

    Substitution: n = m/M = 2.45 g / 98.08 g mol⁻¹

    Result: n = 0.02498 mol ≈ 0.0250 mol (3 s.f.)

  3. S1.4.4% composition ↔ empirical ↔ molecular formulaSLS1.4 primer →
  4. S1.4.5n = cV (mol dm⁻³, g dm⁻³ conversions)SLS1.4 primer →
  5. S1.4.6Avogadro's law: volume ratios of gasesSLS1.4 primer →
  6. S1.5.4PV = nRT; combined gas lawSLS1.5 primer →
  7. R2.1.2MOLE RATIO from a balanced equation → reacting masses / volumes / concentrationsSLR2.1 primer →
  8. R2.1.3limiting reactant → theoretical yieldSLR2.1 primer →

    Worked example: Limiting reactant and percentage yield

    Given: 5.00 g Fe₂O₃ reacts with 3.00 g CO. Actual Fe produced = 2.80 g.

    Step 1 — moles: n(Fe₂O₃) = 5.00/159.7 = 0.0313 mol; n(CO) = 3.00/28.0 = 0.107 mol

    Step 2 — limiting reactant: Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂. 0.0313 mol Fe₂O₃ needs 0.0939 mol CO. We have 0.107 mol CO, so Fe₂O₃ is limiting.

    Step 3 — theoretical yield: n(Fe) = 2 × 0.0313 = 0.0626 mol → m(Fe) = 0.0626 × 55.85 = 3.50 g

    Step 4 — percentage yield: % yield = (2.80/3.50) × 100 = 80.0% (3 s.f.)

  9. R2.1.4% yield = experimental / theoreticalSLR2.1 primer →
  10. R2.1.5atom economySLR2.1 primer →

Branch: Calorimetry and enthalpy

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R1.1.4Q = mcΔT; ΔH = −Q/n (calorimetry)SLR1.1 primer →
  2. R1.2.1average bond enthalpiesSLR1.2 primer →
  3. R1.2.2Hess's lawSLR1.2 primer →
  4. R1.2.4ΣΔH⦵f / ΣΔH⦵c summationsHLR1.2 primer →
  5. R1.2.5Born–Haber cycle values (interpretation only)HLR1.2 primer →

Branch: Rates

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R2.2.1rate from tangents of conc/vol/mass–time graphsSLR2.2 primer →
  2. R2.2.9–11rate equation, order, k and its unitsHLR2.2 primer →
  3. R2.2.12–13Arrhenius: E_a and A from a linear plotHLR2.2 primer →

Branch: Equilibrium

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R2.3.2K expression from stoichiometrySLR2.3 primer →
  2. R2.3.5reaction quotient Q → direction of changeHLR2.3 primer →
  3. R2.3.6K ↔ initial/equilibrium concentrations (K ≪ 1 approximation; no quadratics)HLR2.3 primer →
  4. R2.3.7ΔG⦵ = −RT lnKHLR2.3 primer →

Branch: Acid–base and titration

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R3.1.4pH = −log₁₀[H⁺]; [H⁺] = 10⁻ᵖᴴSLR3.1 primer →
  2. R3.1.5K_w = [H⁺][OH⁻]SLR3.1 primer →
  3. R3.1.7–3.1.8TITRATION stoichiometry + pH curve readingSLR3.1 primer →

    Worked example: Acid–base titration

    Given: 25.0 cm³ of HCl of unknown concentration is titrated with 0.100 mol dm⁻³ NaOH. Mean titre = 23.50 cm³.

    Step 1: n(NaOH) = cV = 0.100 × (23.50/1000) = 0.00235 mol

    Step 2 — mole ratio: HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O, ratio 1:1. n(HCl) = 0.00235 mol

    Step 3: c(HCl) = n/V = 0.00235 / (25.0/1000) = 0.0940 mol dm⁻³ (3 s.f.)

  4. R3.1.9pOH interconversionsHLR3.1 primer →
  5. R3.1.10–11K_a, K_b, pK_a, pK_b; K_a·K_b = K_wHLR3.1 primer →
  6. R3.1.17buffer pH from the equilibrium constantHLR3.1 primer →

Branch: Redox and electrochemistry

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R3.2.2balancing redox half-equations (acidic/neutral)SLR3.2 primer →
  2. R3.2redox TITRATION stoichiometry (self-indicating)SLR3.2 primer →
  3. R3.2.13E⦵cell = E⦵(cathode) − E⦵(anode)HLR3.2 primer →
  4. R3.2.14ΔG⦵ = −nFE⦵cellHLR3.2 primer →

Branch: HL entropy / Gibbs

Descends from the mole ratio step (R2.1.2).

  1. R1.4.1ΔS⦵ = ΣS⦵(products) − ΣS⦵(reactants)HLR1.4 primer →
  2. R1.4.2ΔG⦵ = ΔH⦵ − TΔS⦵ (WATCH THE UNITS)HLR1.4 primer →

    Worked example: HL: ΔG⦵ = ΔH⦵ − TΔS⦵ (watch the units)

    Given: ΔH⦵ = +131 kJ mol⁻¹, ΔS⦵ = +134 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, T = 298 K.

    Step 1 — unit reconciliation: Convert ΔS⦵ to kJ: 134 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ ÷ 1000 = 0.134 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹

    Step 2 — substitution: ΔG⦵ = 131 kJ mol⁻¹ − (298 K × 0.134 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹)

    Step 3: ΔG⦵ = 131 − 39.9 = +91.1 kJ mol⁻¹ (3 s.f.)

    Interpretation: ΔG⦵ > 0, so the reaction is non-spontaneous at 298 K under standard conditions.

    Editorial The J/kJ unit slip is the most frequent single error in ΔG calculations. Always convert ΔS⦵ from J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ to kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ before subtracting from ΔH⦵ in kJ mol⁻¹.

  3. R1.4.3crossover temperature T = ΔH⦵/ΔS⦵HLR1.4 primer →
  4. R1.4.4ΔG = ΔG⦵ + RT lnQHLR1.4 primer →

Other required calculations

These calculations belong to sub-topics that carry quantitative content but do not sit on the central mole chain. They are linked to their parent step where relevant.

  • S1.2.2Non-integer A_r from isotopic abundances (weighted mean)SLS1.2 primer →
  • S1.3.3Max electrons per level = 2n²SLS1.3 primer →
  • S1.3.6First IE from the convergence limit (via E = hf and c = λf)HLS1.3 primer →
  • S2.2.10Retardation factor R_FSLS2.2 primer →
  • S2.4.2Position in bonding triangle from electronegativity data (no % ionic character)SLS2.4 primer →
  • S3.1.6Oxidation statesSLS3.1 primer →
  • S3.1.10Wavelength/frequency of light absorbed vs observed (colour wheel, c = λf)HLS3.1 primer →
  • S3.2.8–11MS fragment m/z; IR wavenumber assignment; ¹H NMR integration ratios and n+1 splittingHLS3.2 primer →
  • R3.4.8Charge on a complex ion from ligand identitiesHLR3.4 primer →

You do NOT need to

The guide explicitly excludes the following mathematics. Do not spend time learning these:

  • Quadratic equations in equilibrium or K_a/K_b calculations.
  • Non-integer reaction orders.
  • Mathematical treatment of real-gas deviation (no van der Waals equation).
  • Percentage ionic character calculations.
  • Construction of a complete Born–Haber cycle (interpretation only).
  • Quantitative treatment of heterogeneous equilibria (homogeneous only).
  • Acidity of hydrated transition-element ions / Al³⁺(aq).
  • Hybridization beyond sp, sp² and sp³.

Personal data loaded.